2/29/2024 0 Comments A portrait of a lady on fire![]() The match requires a portrait, but Héloïse has refused to sit for one, so Marianne is contracted to pose as her companion while secretly painting her from memory. Marianne, the daughter of a celebrated painter, is brought over from the mainland by a countess (Valeria Golino) who is desperate to marry her daughter Héloïse to a Milanese nobleman. Portrait of a Lady on Fire is a level more ambitious, mostly because of its dramatic setting: a remote island off the coast of Brittany in the late 18th century. Sciamma’s first three films- Water Lilies (2007), Tomboy (2011), and Girlhood (2014)-were all contemporary tales of adolescence and coming of age in modern France, told with frank sensitivity. For me, it is the most enthralling cinema experience of the year. The film is a grand leap forward for Sciamma, already one of France’s most exciting emerging directors. But it’s also a film about the deeply personal process of creativity-the pain and joy of making one’s emotions and memories into a work of art. Portrait of a Lady on Fire is primarily a romance. The story’s crucial tension lies in Héloïse’s question: not knowing when that end will come. As the film progresses, artist and subject are drawn into a romance that fuels the former’s talent but, because of 18th-century close-mindedness, is doomed to end. “At one point, we stop,” Marianne replies. “When do we know it’s finished?” Héloïse asks. After a while, Héloïse (Adèle Haenel), the woman Marianne is painting, sidles up to gaze at what she’s produced. I see this picture called "The perfect film", to that I must conclude this is your first time, there's much more in store for you.When Marianne (played by Noémie Merlant), the heroine of Céline Sciamma’s Portrait of a Lady on Fire, paints, the viewer can feel every dab on the canvas and hear every brushstroke as her workmanlike effort creates a graceful piece of art. Offended as I was by the lack of substance within the picture, they provided me with something to get passionate about, even if that may be the distaste for the picture itself. Perhaps this film excels at nothing.Īs I do with any art related enterprise, I give props to the filmmakers for making art, participating in the craft, and for throwing in their two cents. ![]() Just as I relaxed uncomfortably, a thought of Barry Lyndon came to my head. Resorting to taking in the pretty pictures, I landed at the conclusion that this was what the film was, and just that. I tossed and turned in this manner until I had no longer cared as to construe purpose in the film. Maybe that was the point, a realist approach, showing it as it were, I had surmised. I was grasping for threads to follow, themes of substance, anything, I was starving. I found myself counting the seconds between each line of dialogue delivered. It gave me the latter, perhaps the most tedious, plodding, most unenjoyable cinema experience in recent memory. I waited for this movie to give me anything, something I could leave with, something to shock me, something I haven't seen before. To evoke the saying "throw me a bone", this movie showed me its bones, one by one, placed them clumsily into its various pockets and tripped into the sea. I felt gypped, cheated, mislead, though, happy to see the back of it. I, unfortunately, find myself to be one of few (at least vocal) cinemagoers who did not like the film. My concern has grown since going to watch it. I find it dubious that there exist very few negative reviews for this film, as I would with any film. I UNDERSTAND THE STRUGGLE." - What people think after watching this imagined by my gf. "Oh my God, like.Being **** back then for women must have been SOoooo Harrrrrd. but shots of her walking around an empty dark building slowly with a candle can only hold my attention for so long. Lots of long shots with no music or dialogue. I'm glad everyone is enjoying this movie. Hearing the audience giggle at certain points showed the company I was in. There were some moments I enjoyed for sure. I loved the opening on the boat, gave a sense of raw realism. Some very beautiful shots & imagery in this movie. The close-up shots of her painting were nice but did get a bit much for me at times. This movie is 5/5 if you enjoy movies with minimal story and long shots of peoples faces. "The director probably had kids and was married when she realized she was a lesbian and was like.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |